[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 184] new mailing lists proposal for libre-soc.org

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 184] new mailing lists proposal for libre-soc.org

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184

--- Comment #9 from Alain D D Williams <addw@phcomp.co.uk> ---
I have set up the list Libre-soc-dev here:

http://lists.libre-soc.org/mailman/admin/libre-soc-dev/general

I have copied users across and been through and applied digest choices (by
hand) & administrative 'nomail' settings. I could not set a user 'nomail'
setting for flisu@flisu.pl - they can reset if they want to.

The list should work. I have unset the new-user-welcome-message - so no one
knows that they are on the list - we will set that when we are happy with it;
then send something to the list telling them about it.

When we enable the new list I suggest that we set emergency moderation on the
old one, discard everything sent to it & have the bounce text say something
suitable.

I can also set up a Libre-soc-org list - please tell me that you are happy with
the above first. Should I copy users to that or let people subscribe ?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 184] new mailing lists proposal for libre-soc.org

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184

--- Comment #10 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> ---
ok http://lists.libre-soc.org/mailman/listinfo looks great, alain.
two more:
* libre-soc-builds
* libre-soc-bugs

both of these need to be subscribable but put into "moderator" mode,
with only two (authorised) posters permitted.  one of those we know
right now (bugzilla-daemon@libre-soc.org), this should be the
*only* permitted poster to libre-soc-bugs@lists.libre-soc.org

the other one we will sort out later (with jacob's help and input)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 184] new mailing lists proposal for libre-soc.org

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184

--- Comment #11 from Jacob Lifshay <programmerjake@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #10)
> ok http://lists.libre-soc.org/mailman/listinfo looks great, alain.
> two more:
> * libre-soc-builds
> * libre-soc-bugs
> 
> both of these need to be subscribable but put into "moderator" mode,
> with only two (authorised) posters permitted.  one of those we know
> right now (bugzilla-daemon@libre-soc.org), this should be the
> *only* permitted poster to libre-soc-bugs@lists.libre-soc.org
> 
> the other one we will sort out later (with jacob's help and input)

I'm guessing the source address will be
git-mirroring@jacob-build-server.programmerjake.tk

If you can, the Reply-To: header for both special-use mailing lists should be
set to libre-soc-dev@libre-soc.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 184] new mailing lists proposal for libre-soc.org

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184

--- Comment #12 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> ---
(In reply to Jacob Lifshay from comment #11)

> I'm guessing the source address will be
> git-mirroring@jacob-build-server.programmerjake.tk

ah if you install ssmtp and set it up similar to how it is done on the
ppc64 server, we can make it look like the messages are coming from
libre-soc.org.

take a look in the /etc/ssmtp directory on the pp64 server

> If you can, the Reply-To: header for both special-use mailing lists should
> be set to libre-soc-dev@libre-soc.org

hmmm a case could be made for teaching people "um no you go to the
bugtracker" by rejecting replies.  otherwise they will think that they
_should_ reply and we are back to square one.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 184] new mailing lists proposal for libre-soc.org

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184

--- Comment #13 from Jacob Lifshay <programmerjake@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #12)
> (In reply to Jacob Lifshay from comment #11)
> 
> > I'm guessing the source address will be
> > git-mirroring@jacob-build-server.programmerjake.tk
> 
> ah if you install ssmtp and set it up similar to how it is done on the
> ppc64 server, we can make it look like the messages are coming from
> libre-soc.org.

If we use the lettre.at library for sending build emails, we could set it to
just connect directly to libre-soc.org over the vpn without needing a local
email server. We could also make the source address be builds@libre-soc.org
instead of git-mirroring@jacob-build-server.programmerjake.tk that way it won't
change if we move to a different server. 

> take a look in the /etc/ssmtp directory on the pp64 server
>  
> > If you can, the Reply-To: header for both special-use mailing lists should
> > be set to libre-soc-dev@libre-soc.org
> 
> hmmm a case could be made for teaching people "um no you go to the
> bugtracker" by rejecting replies.  otherwise they will think that they
> _should_ reply and we are back to square one.

We could add a link to the new bug page to the emails sent out to the builds
mailing list. If we are going to reject replies we should set Reply-To: to
no-reply@libre-soc.org instead of leaving it as the default.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 184] new mailing lists proposal for libre-soc.org

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184

--- Comment #14 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> ---
(In reply to Jacob Lifshay from comment #13)
> (In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #12)
> > (In reply to Jacob Lifshay from comment #11)
> > 
> > > I'm guessing the source address will be
> > > git-mirroring@jacob-build-server.programmerjake.tk
> > 
> > ah if you install ssmtp and set it up similar to how it is done on the
> > ppc64 server, we can make it look like the messages are coming from
> > libre-soc.org.
> 
> If we use the lettre.at library for sending build emails, we could set it to
> just connect directly to libre-soc.org over the vpn without needing a local
> email server.

ssmtp is not a local email server it's a redirector.

the less that gets done here the better.

can you arrange for the command to call an external command - the faster
this gets done in the least amount of time the better.

(there's no need to use a complicated advanced rust mail library:
get the information out as fast as possible and let *another*
external command do that job, this provides flexibility)


> We could also make the source address be builds@libre-soc.org
> instead of git-mirroring@jacob-build-server.programmerjake.tk that way it
> won't change if we move to a different server. 

yes.

> > take a look in the /etc/ssmtp directory on the pp64 server
> >  
> > > If you can, the Reply-To: header for both special-use mailing lists should
> > > be set to libre-soc-dev@libre-soc.org
> > 
> > hmmm a case could be made for teaching people "um no you go to the
> > bugtracker" by rejecting replies.  otherwise they will think that they
> > _should_ reply and we are back to square one.
> 
> We could add a link to the new bug page to the emails sent out to the builds
> mailing list. If we are going to reject replies we should set Reply-To: to
> no-reply@libre-soc.org instead of leaving it as the default.

yep good idea.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 184] new mailing lists proposal for libre-soc.org

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184

--- Comment #15 from Jacob Lifshay <programmerjake@gmail.com> ---
Maybe it would be a good idea to ask marc.info to add our mailing lists to
their archive:

https://marc.info/?q=about

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 184] new mailing lists proposal for libre-soc.org

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184

--- Comment #16 from Jacob Lifshay <programmerjake@gmail.com> ---
don't know that this is the right bug report:

the CI build status mailing list and the sendmail bash script and the calling
gitlab-ci-archiver all need to be set up -- gitlab-ci-archiver will probably be
running on jacob-build-server.

the gitlab rust library that's used needs to have the changes upstreamed which
is mostly stalled, additionally, the upstream is currently rewriting the API in
a different way than how I had written the API modifications that
gitlab-ci-archiver is relying on.

The pull requests for my modifications:
https://gitlab.kitware.com/utils/rust-gitlab/-/merge_requests/215
https://gitlab.kitware.com/utils/rust-gitlab/-/merge_requests/217

The upstream changelog for the upstream API modifications:
https://gitlab.kitware.com/utils/rust-gitlab/-/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#new-api-strategy

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 184] new mailing lists proposal for libre-soc.org

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184

Cole Poirier <colepoirier@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |colepoirier@gmail.com

--- Comment #17 from Cole Poirier <colepoirier@gmail.com> ---
Since we have completed the domain move, and we now have pitch meetings with
potential investors coming up, I think it is essential that we set up the
Libre-SOC-Org mailing list.

In addition to this, I'd like to suggest that we have a short weekly meeting
(~30 min) to discuss organizational matters, which should be recorded and made
available somehow. I found the OPF virtual coffee call to be very good for
adding some more connection to our highly distributed team. I think the purpose
of these meeting should be to discuss and layout proposals, for further
discussion on, and subject to unanimous approval by the Libre-SOC-Org mailing
list. 

I'm writing this here because it's directly related to mailing lists. If you
find my idea of the video organizational chats to be worthy of further
discussion, then I think this will merit the creation of a new bug report. 

I think it's also a good idea to add a new category of bug report to the thee
existing "Libre-SOC Website", "Libre-SOC First SOC", and "TODO IIT Madras 180nm
Foundry", perhaps "Systemes Libres Organization", such that technical bugs are
not mixed with non-technical bugs.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 184] new mailing lists proposal for libre-soc.org

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184

--- Comment #18 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> ---
(In reply to Cole Poirier from comment #17)
> Since we have completed the domain move, and we now have pitch meetings with
> potential investors coming up, I think it is essential that we set up the
> Libre-SOC-Org mailing list.

they're done several weeks ago: i don't believe anyone realises that they're
there:

http://lists.libre-soc.org/mailman/listinfo

> In addition to this, I'd like to suggest that we have a short weekly meeting
> (~30 min) to discuss organizational matters, which should be recorded and
> made available somehow. I found the OPF virtual coffee call to be very good
> for adding some more connection to our highly distributed team. I think the
> purpose of these meeting should be to discuss and layout proposals, for
> further discussion on, and subject to unanimous approval by the
> Libre-SOC-Org mailing list. 
> 
> I'm writing this here because it's directly related to mailing lists. If you
> find my idea of the video organizational chats to be worthy of further
> discussion, then I think this will merit the creation of a new bug report. 

yes go for it, i like it.

> I think it's also a good idea to add a new category of bug report to the
> thee existing "Libre-SOC Website", "Libre-SOC First SOC", and "TODO IIT
> Madras 180nm Foundry", perhaps "Systemes Libres Organization", such that
> technical bugs are not mixed with non-technical bugs.

separate bugreport for that, too :)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 184] new mailing lists proposal for libre-soc.org

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184

--- Comment #19 from Cole Poirier <colepoirier@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #18)
> (In reply to Cole Poirier from comment #17)
> > Since we have completed the domain move, and we now have pitch meetings with
> > potential investors coming up, I think it is essential that we set up the
> > Libre-SOC-Org mailing list.
> 
> they're done several weeks ago: i don't believe anyone realises that they're
> there:
> 
> http://lists.libre-soc.org/mailman/listinfo

You're right, I saw the emails in april, but didn't realize then that this was
complete. Thanks so much Alain! I think this discussion now falls under the
scope of bug #366.

> > In addition to this, I'd like to suggest that we have a short weekly meeting
> > (~30 min) to discuss organizational matters, which should be recorded and
> > made available somehow. I found the OPF virtual coffee call to be very good
> > for adding some more connection to our highly distributed team. I think the
> > purpose of these meeting should be to discuss and layout proposals, for
> > further discussion on, and subject to unanimous approval by the
> > Libre-SOC-Org mailing list. 
> > 
> > I'm writing this here because it's directly related to mailing lists. If you
> > find my idea of the video organizational chats to be worthy of further
> > discussion, then I think this will merit the creation of a new bug report. 
> 
> yes go for it, i like it.

Done. Bug #367 <https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367>

> > I think it's also a good idea to add a new category of bug report to the
> > thee existing "Libre-SOC Website", "Libre-SOC First SOC", and "TODO IIT
> > Madras 180nm Foundry", perhaps "Systemes Libres Organization", such that
> > technical bugs are not mixed with non-technical bugs.
> 
> separate bugreport for that, too :)

Done. bug #366 <https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366>

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 184] new mailing lists proposal for libre-soc.org

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184

--- Comment #20 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> ---
just checking by subscribing to libre-soc-misc, should they be
libre-soc-misc@lists.libre-soc.org

or


libre-soc-misc@libre-soc.org

i kiiinda prefer the convention of a separate domain name

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 184] new mailing lists proposal for libre-soc.org

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184

--- Comment #21 from Cole Poirier <colepoirier@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #20)
> just checking by subscribing to libre-soc-misc, should they be
> libre-soc-misc@lists.libre-soc.org
> 
> or
> 
> 
> libre-soc-misc@libre-soc.org
> 
> i kiiinda prefer the convention of a separate domain name

I Agree. I prefer libre-soc-misc@libre-soc.org

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 184] new mailing lists proposal for libre-soc.org

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184

--- Comment #22 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> ---
(In reply to Cole Poirier from comment #21)
> (In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #20)
> > just checking by subscribing to libre-soc-misc, should they be
> > libre-soc-misc@lists.libre-soc.org

> > i kiiinda prefer the convention of a separate domain name
> 
> I Agree. I prefer libre-soc-misc@libre-soc.org

turns out they are in fact at lists.libre-soc.org because exim4 can't easily be
configured to merge mailman on one vhost and email addresses on another.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 184] new mailing lists proposal for libre-soc.org

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |libre-soc-bugs@lists.libre-
                   |                            |soc.org

--- Comment #23 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> ---
i've created libre-soc-bugs@lists.libre-soc.org
the next major task is to move almost every "cc" in all 385 bugs
over to that list (except for the new "Organisation" ones)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 184] new mailing lists proposal for libre-soc.org

[bugzilla-daemon]

http://bugs.libre-riscv.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184

--- Comment #8 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> ---
we also will need an auto-build (continuous integration) list where
notifications (read-only) about builds and tests are sent.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 184] new mailing lists proposal for libre-soc.org

[bugzilla-daemon]

http://bugs.libre-riscv.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184

--- Comment #7 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> ---
public-inbox needs to be set up for each list as well

see /home/publicinbox and fortunately it's possible to have
a per-list-filter despite all messages going into /home/publicinbox/Maildir

the config (/home/publicinbox/.public-inbox/config) basically has
a filter to look for (the listid) and, when spotted, sucks that message
out.

btw, i recall now: we are *not* using Maildir, the messages are delivered
*directly* to publicinboxmda, actually in exim4:

/etc/exim4/conf.d/router/890-local_publicinbox:    local_parts = publicinbox

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

Re: [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 184] new mailing lists proposal for libre-soc.org

[Cole Poirier]

On Mar 21 2020, at 4:24 pm, bugzilla-daemon@libre-riscv.org wrote:
> http://bugs.libre-riscv.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184
> --- Comment #6 from vklr@vkten.in <vklr@vkten.in> ---
> (In reply to Jacob Lifshay from comment #4)
>> (In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #0)
>> > These should be *new* lists on libre-soc.org (retire libre-riscv-dev)
>> > 
>> > 1) Libre-SOC-Dev, for hardware and software development (productive)
>> > discussion
>> > 2) Libre-SOC-Org, for discussion about related to the organization
>> > itself, such as funding, investing, finances, domain change, website
>> > design, members, ethics, business, administration, you get my point
>> > 3) Libre-SOC-Misc, for everything else (the non serious stuff that I
>> > can safely ignore unlike the first two which should have important
>> > stuff only)
>> > 4) Bugtracker separate list, readonly announce only, and replyto
>> set to
>> > bugzilla ready for when/if incoming bugzilla is ever set up
>> 
>> I think the above proposal is a good idea. When we finally shut-down
>> libre-riscv-dev, I think we should send out a single notification
>> email to
>> everyone who's subscribed even if they have mail delivery turned off. We
>> should also announce our name & domain change on crowdsupply.
>> 
>> Is everyone ok with the above plan?
> 
> I am also fine with it.

I endorse this plan.

Cole

_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 184] new mailing lists proposal for libre-soc.org

[bugzilla-daemon]

http://bugs.libre-riscv.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184

vklr@vkten.in <vklr@vkten.in> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |vklr@vkten.in

--- Comment #6 from vklr@vkten.in <vklr@vkten.in> ---
(In reply to Jacob Lifshay from comment #4)
> (In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #0)
> > These should be *new* lists on libre-soc.org (retire libre-riscv-dev)
> > 
> > 1) Libre-SOC-Dev, for hardware and software development (productive)
> > discussion
> > 2) Libre-SOC-Org, for discussion about related to the organization
> > itself, such as funding, investing, finances, domain change, website
> > design, members, ethics, business, administration, you get my point
> > 3) Libre-SOC-Misc, for everything else (the non serious stuff that I
> > can safely ignore unlike the first two which should have important
> > stuff only)
> > 4) Bugtracker separate list, readonly announce only, and replyto set to
> > bugzilla ready for when/if incoming bugzilla is ever set up
> 
> I think the above proposal is a good idea. When we finally shut-down
> libre-riscv-dev, I think we should send out a single notification email to
> everyone who's subscribed even if they have mail delivery turned off. We
> should also announce our name & domain change on crowdsupply.
> 
> Is everyone ok with the above plan?

I am also fine with it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 184] new mailing lists proposal for libre-soc.org

[bugzilla-daemon]

http://bugs.libre-riscv.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184

--- Comment #5 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> ---
(In reply to Jacob Lifshay from comment #4)
> (In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #0)
> > These should be *new* lists on libre-soc.org (retire libre-riscv-dev)
> > 
> > 1) Libre-SOC-Dev, for hardware and software development (productive)
> > discussion
> > 2) Libre-SOC-Org, for discussion about related to the organization
> > itself, such as funding, investing, finances, domain change, website
> > design, members, ethics, business, administration, you get my point
> > 3) Libre-SOC-Misc, for everything else (the non serious stuff that I
> > can safely ignore unlike the first two which should have important
> > stuff only)
> > 4) Bugtracker separate list, readonly announce only, and replyto set to
> > bugzilla ready for when/if incoming bugzilla is ever set up
> 
> I think the above proposal is a good idea. When we finally shut-down
> libre-riscv-dev, I think we should send out a single notification email to
> everyone who's subscribed even if they have mail delivery turned off.

i can do that.

i'd also like to just "migrate" everyone currently on the dev list to... the
dev list and let them decide from there

> We
> should also announce our name & domain change on crowdsupply.

yes.

> 
> Is everyone ok with the above plan?

fine with me.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 184] new mailing lists proposal for libre-soc.org

[bugzilla-daemon]

http://bugs.libre-riscv.org/show_bug.cgi?id=184

--- Comment #4 from Jacob Lifshay <programmerjake@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #0)
> These should be *new* lists on libre-soc.org (retire libre-riscv-dev)
> 
> 1) Libre-SOC-Dev, for hardware and software development (productive)
> discussion
> 2) Libre-SOC-Org, for discussion about related to the organization
> itself, such as funding, investing, finances, domain change, website
> design, members, ethics, business, administration, you get my point
> 3) Libre-SOC-Misc, for everything else (the non serious stuff that I
> can safely ignore unlike the first two which should have important
> stuff only)
> 4) Bugtracker separate list, readonly announce only, and replyto set to
> bugzilla ready for when/if incoming bugzilla is ever set up

I think the above proposal is a good idea. When we finally shut-down
libre-riscv-dev, I think we should send out a single notification email to
everyone who's subscribed even if they have mail delivery turned off. We should
also announce our name & domain change on crowdsupply.

Is everyone ok with the above plan?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev