From: bugzilla-daemon@libre-soc.org
To: libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
Subject: [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 353] formal proof of soc.regfile classes RegFile and RegFileArray needed
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 16:45:13 +0000
Message-ID: <bug-353-13-0PUtcMqZoo@https.bugs.libre-soc.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-353-13@https.bugs.libre-soc.org/>
https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353
--- Comment #3 from Cole Poirier <colepoirier@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #2)
> (In reply to Cole Poirier from comment #1)
> > if this proof is needed before then for the virtual_port tests,
>
> it's not. i have a preliminary virtual_port test running, yesterday.
Saw your 'proof-of-concept' test case yesterday, was helpful for understanding
the functionality of the module further. Unfortunately, I think this test is
now failing with the following error:
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "virtual_port.py", line 203, in <module>
test_regfile()
File "virtual_port.py", line 200, in test_regfile
vcd_name='test_regfile_array.vcd')
File "/home/colepoirier/src/nmigen/nmigen/compat/sim/__init__.py", line 22,
in run_simulation
fragment.domains += ClockDomain("sync")
AttributeError: 'VirtualRegPort' object has no attribute 'domains'
```
I suspect it's a simple fix, but the answer is not immediately apparent to me.
> > Luke please
> > feel free to take it over like you did with virtual_port today. I want to
> > help, so I don't want my learning while working slowly to be a blocker :)
>
> i don't totally get them either, so we work on it together, over time, ok?
>
> as you have probably noticed, i tend to write "proof-of-concept" unit
> tests that at least give a basic level of confidence then move quickly
> on. this will allow rapid progress but will bite us in corner-cases.
Indeed, it seems to be a very productive strategy. Looking forward to working
with you on the proof today. Just reviewing my notes now, should have some code
for some of the basic assumptions committed in the next hour.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev
next prev parent reply index
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-26 0:13 [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 353] New: " bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-26 0:13 ` [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 353] " bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-26 23:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-27 4:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-27 11:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-27 16:45 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2020-05-27 17:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-27 17:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-27 18:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-27 18:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-27 18:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-27 18:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-27 19:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-27 19:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-28 1:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-28 1:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-28 1:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-28 2:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-28 10:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-28 14:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-28 16:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-28 19:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-28 20:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-28 20:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-28 23:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-28 23:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-28 23:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-30 21:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-30 22:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-30 22:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-30 22:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-31 14:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-31 18:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-01 17:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-01 17:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-01 17:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-01 17:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-01 17:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-01 18:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-01 18:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-01 18:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-02 12:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-353-13-0PUtcMqZoo@https.bugs.libre-soc.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@libre-soc.org \
--cc=libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Libre RISC-V Mailing list Archives (accessible via public-inbox)
Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://inbox.libre-soc.org/libre-riscv-dev
Example config snippet for mirrors
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git