[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 307] New: look at installing a kan-ban board on top of bugzilla

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 307] New: look at installing a kan-ban board on top of bugzilla

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307

            Bug ID: 307
           Summary: look at installing a kan-ban board on top of bugzilla
           Product: Libre-RISC-V Website
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: PC
                OS: Mac OS
            Status: CONFIRMED
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: ---
         Component: website
          Assignee: lkcl@lkcl.net
          Reporter: lkcl@lkcl.net
                CC: libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
   NLnet milestone: ---

example such as this https://github.com/leif81/bzkanban

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 307] look at installing a kan-ban board on top of bugzilla

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|lkcl@lkcl.net               |addw@phcomp.co.uk

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 307] look at installing a kan-ban board on top of bugzilla

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307

--- Comment #1 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> ---
https://github.com/mozilla/kanbanzilla huge weird mixture of dependencies, nice
concept, far too many dependencies (node, ruby, python - wtf??)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 307] look at installing a kan-ban board on top of bugzilla

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307

Jock Tanner <tanner.of.kha@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |tanner.of.kha@gmail.com

--- Comment #2 from Jock Tanner <tanner.of.kha@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #1)
> https://github.com/mozilla/kanbanzilla huge weird mixture of dependencies,
> nice
> concept, far too many dependencies (node, ruby, python - wtf??)

Only Python is a run-time dependency though. Node is needed once to build
browser JS, Ruby − for CSS.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 307] look at installing a kan-ban board on top of bugzilla

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307

--- Comment #3 from Alain D D Williams <addw@phcomp.co.uk> ---
For this to work bugzilla needs to have the REST API option enabled.

Please can you, Luke, enable this or give me appropriate admin rights so that I
can do this.

Thanks

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 307] look at installing a kan-ban board on top of bugzilla

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307

--- Comment #4 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> ---
done, alain.  however it's not something you enable, it's always there
(rest.cgi)
https://bugzilla.readthedocs.io/en/latest/installing/nginx.html

this config is *different* from the one in /etc/nginx/sites-enabled/bugzilla

i think it might be that the script is always forced to be index.cgi

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 307] look at installing a kan-ban board on top of bugzilla

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307

--- Comment #5 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> ---
https://bugs.libre-soc.org/rest.cgi

works (and is returning a "readthedocs" comment)

however https://bugs.libre-soc.org/rest/{anything} 

is not working.

this indicates some sort of error with the nginx location-redirect section
in sites-available/bugzilla

    location /rest {
        rewrite ^/rest/(.*)$ rest.cgi/$1 last;
    }

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 307] look at installing a kan-ban board on top of bugzilla

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307

--- Comment #6 from Alain D D Williams <addw@phcomp.co.uk> ---
Replacing:
rewrite ^/rest/(.*)$ /rest.cgi/$1 last;
by:
rewrite ^/rest/(.*)$ /rest.cgi?$1 last;

is an improvement ... but not the fix.

Going to https://bugs.libre-soc.org/rest/version I now get

{"documentation":"https://bugzilla.readthedocs.org/en/5.0/api/","code":32614,"message":"A
REST API resource was not found for 'GET '.","error":true}

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 307] look at installing a kan-ban board on top of bugzilla

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307

--- Comment #7 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> ---
this may simply be because it is a POST API.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 307] look at installing a kan-ban board on top of bugzilla

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307

Cole Poirier <colepoirier@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |colepoirier@gmail.com

--- Comment #8 from Cole Poirier <colepoirier@gmail.com> ---
I think having the kanban board will help centralize our communication/planning
for the the source code, but be especially helpful for working on the
interfaces and final product specifications as well as with visualizing
timelines. I like bugzilla and think it's fit for purpose, but I'd also like to
be able to view some of the information on a much more structured (visually)
form, and be able to put a lot of the info that's spread across various bug
reports and wiki pages into a central interface for a more high-level overhead
view of the various tracks of the project. What's the status of this bug report
currently Alain? Once it's up and running I'll work on taking the information
from wiki pages and mailing list discussions and integrating it into the specs
for the interface bugs on bugzilla. Do you (libre-soc devs) think this an
action will be useful?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 307] look at installing a kan-ban board on top of bugzilla

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307

--- Comment #9 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> ---
(In reply to Cole Poirier from comment #8)
> I think having the kanban board will help centralize our
> communication/planning for the the source code, but be especially helpful
> for working on the interfaces and final product specifications as well as
> with visualizing timelines.

yes.

> I like bugzilla and think it's fit for purpose,

i like it other than it's centralised (has no option to store its data in a git
repository).

> but I'd also like to be able to view some of the information on a much more
> structured (visually) form,

yes me too.  i installed graphviz on the server (xdot) so that dependency
graphs now work.

however a kanban board is much superior.

> and be able to put a lot of the info that's
> spread across various bug reports and wiki pages into a central interface
> for a more high-level overhead view of the various tracks of the project.
> What's the status of this bug report currently Alain?

alain sent something a few days ago.  he was able to ascertain that apache2
fastcgi redirection works perfectly, where nginx does not.

rather than waste time working out why i am inclined to recommend a deployment
where apache2 operates on port 8080 120.0.0.1 and nginx does a transparent
proxy for bugs.libre-soc.org


> Once it's up and
> running I'll work on taking the information from wiki pages and mailing list
> discussions and integrating it into the specs for the interface bugs on
> bugzilla. Do you (libre-soc devs) think this an action will be useful?

yes.

example: not having a visual tracker stops people from appreciating that of the
370 bugs on here, well over 300 of them are specifically assigned to me.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 307] look at installing a kan-ban board on top of bugzilla

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307

--- Comment #10 from Cole Poirier <colepoirier@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #9)
> (In reply to Cole Poirier from comment #8)
> > I like bugzilla and think it's fit for purpose,
> 
> i like it other than it's centralised (has no option to store its data in a
> git repository).

Interesting... What is required for such decentralization? In other words why
can't bugzilla be backed by a git data store?

> > but I'd also like to be able to view some of the information on a much more
> > structured (visually) form,
> 
> yes me too.  i installed graphviz on the server (xdot) so that dependency
> graphs now work.
> 
> however a kanban board is much superior.

Saw that, it's cool, but not quite as useful as the board as it does not show
that >300 of the <400 total bugs are assigned to you... among other things :)

> alain sent something a few days ago.  he was able to ascertain that apache2
> fastcgi redirection works perfectly, where nginx does not.
> 
> rather than waste time working out why i am inclined to recommend a
> deployment where apache2 operates on port 8080 120.0.0.1 and nginx does a
> transparent proxy for bugs.libre-soc.org

Sure, I think apache via nginx is fine. Alain, should the kanban board work
after this is done?

> yes.
> 
> example: not having a visual tracker stops people from appreciating that of
> the 370 bugs on here, well over 300 of them are specifically assigned to me.

Indeed. I think we need a space separate from the "libre-riscv website"
bugzilla product do discuss the specifics of these organizational matters. Can
you please create a new component "Libre-SOC Organizational" for "Product:
Libre-SOC's first SoC". Or would it be better to create a new bugzilla
'Product' "Libre-SOC Organization and Planning" like we have "Product
Libre-riscv website"?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 307] look at installing a kan-ban board on top of bugzilla

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307

--- Comment #11 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> ---
(In reply to Cole Poirier from comment #10)
> (In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #9)
> > (In reply to Cole Poirier from comment #8)
> > > I like bugzilla and think it's fit for purpose,
> > 
> > i like it other than it's centralised (has no option to store its data in a
> > git repository).
> 
> Interesting... What is required for such decentralization? In other words
> why can't bugzilla be backed by a git data store?

probably simply because nobody came up with the idea.  bugseverywhere which
does exactly that is not very commonly used.

>  
> > > but I'd also like to be able to view some of the information on a much more
> > > structured (visually) form,
> > 
> > yes me too.  i installed graphviz on the server (xdot) so that dependency
> > graphs now work.
> > 
> > however a kanban board is much superior.
> 
> Saw that, it's cool, but not quite as useful as the board as it does not
> show that >300 of the <400 total bugs are assigned to you... among other
> things :)
> 
> > alain sent something a few days ago.  he was able to ascertain that apache2
> > fastcgi redirection works perfectly, where nginx does not.
> > 
> > rather than waste time working out why i am inclined to recommend a
> > deployment where apache2 operates on port 8080 120.0.0.1 and nginx does a
> > transparent proxy for bugs.libre-soc.org
> 
> Sure, I think apache via nginx is fine. Alain, should the kanban board work
> after this is done?
> 
> > yes.
> > 
> > example: not having a visual tracker stops people from appreciating that of
> > the 370 bugs on here, well over 300 of them are specifically assigned to me.
> 
> Indeed. I think we need a space separate from the "libre-riscv website"

ah ok

> bugzilla product do discuss the specifics of these organizational matters.
> Can you please create a new component "Libre-SOC Organizational" for
> "Product: Libre-SOC's first SoC". Or would it be better to create a new
> bugzilla 'Product' "Libre-SOC Organization and Planning" like we have
> "Product Libre-riscv website"?

yep.  toplevel.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

Re: [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 307] look at installing a kan-ban board on top of bugzilla

[Alain D D Williams]

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 03:54:42PM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@libre-soc.org wrote:

> > alain sent something a few days ago.  he was able to ascertain that apache2
> > fastcgi redirection works perfectly, where nginx does not.

It could be my inexperience with nginx - but bugzilla documentation had a strong
preference for apache.

> > rather than waste time working out why i am inclined to recommend a
> > deployment where apache2 operates on port 8080 120.0.0.1 and nginx does a
> > transparent proxy for bugs.libre-soc.org

> Sure, I think apache via nginx is fine. Alain, should the kanban board work
> after this is done?

Well - it worked under Apache so I do not see why not.

I tried this under Debian 10 - the current libre-soc machine runs Debian 9 - but
I would be surprised if it made a difference -- famous last words.

I will also point it at the latest version of buzilla that I installed a few
days ago.

First thing is apache on port 8080, get that to work, then worry about proxying.

-- 
Alain Williams
Linux/GNU Consultant - Mail systems, Web sites, Networking, Programmer, IT Lecturer.
+44 (0) 787 668 0256  https://www.phcomp.co.uk/
Parliament Hill Computers Ltd. Registration Information: https://www.phcomp.co.uk/Contact.html
#include <std_disclaimer.h>

_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 307] look at installing a kan-ban board on top of bugzilla

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307

--- Comment #12 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> ---
(In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #11)
> (In reply to Cole Poirier from comment #10)
> > bugzilla product do discuss the specifics of these organizational matters.
> > Can you please create a new component "Libre-SOC Organizational" for
> > "Product: Libre-SOC's first SoC". Or would it be better to create a new
> > bugzilla 'Product' "Libre-SOC Organization and Planning" like we have
> > "Product Libre-riscv website"?
> 
> yep.  toplevel.

done, default cc is libre-soc-org@libre-soc.org and you are the default
assignee, congratulations.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 307] look at installing a kan-ban board on top of bugzilla

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307

--- Comment #13 from Cole Poirier <colepoirier@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #12)
> (In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #11)
> > (In reply to Cole Poirier from comment #10)
> > > bugzilla product do discuss the specifics of these organizational matters.
> > > Can you please create a new component "Libre-SOC Organizational" for
> > > "Product: Libre-SOC's first SoC". Or would it be better to create a new
> > > bugzilla 'Product' "Libre-SOC Organization and Planning" like we have
> > > "Product Libre-riscv website"?
> > 
> > yep.  toplevel.
> 
> done, default cc is libre-soc-org@libre-soc.org and you are the default
> assignee, congratulations.

Thank you kindly. I'm looking forward to taking a very active role in the
organizational and 'project management' aspects while I slowly improve my
technical skills. The most important thing is that I continue to be very
diligent - as a take on a 'larger' role, with much more responsibility - in my
inviolable obligations under the charter to be transparent and operate based on
consensus decision making. It is new responsibility that I am being granted not
authority.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 307] look at installing a kan-ban board on top of bugzilla

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307

--- Comment #14 from Alain D D Williams <addw@phcomp.co.uk> ---
Repost: as reply to email does not appear here:

> > alain sent something a few days ago.  he was able to ascertain that apache2
> > fastcgi redirection works perfectly, where nginx does not.

It could be my inexperience with nginx - but bugzilla documentation had a
strong
preference for apache.

> > rather than waste time working out why i am inclined to recommend a
> > deployment where apache2 operates on port 8080 120.0.0.1 and nginx does a
> > transparent proxy for bugs.libre-soc.org

> Sure, I think apache via nginx is fine. Alain, should the kanban board work
> after this is done?

Well - it worked under Apache so I do not see why not.

I tried this under Debian 10 - the current libre-soc machine runs Debian 9 -
but
I would be surprised if it made a difference -- famous last words.

I will also point it at the latest version of buzilla that I installed a few
days ago.

First thing is apache on port 8080, get that to work, then worry about
proxying.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 307] look at installing a kan-ban board on top of bugzilla

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307

--- Comment #15 from Cole Poirier <colepoirier@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #12)
> (In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #11)
> > (In reply to Cole Poirier from comment #10)
> > > bugzilla product do discuss the specifics of these organizational matters.
> > > Can you please create a new component "Libre-SOC Organizational" for
> > > "Product: Libre-SOC's first SoC". Or would it be better to create a new
> > > bugzilla 'Product' "Libre-SOC Organization and Planning" like we have
> > > "Product Libre-riscv website"?
> > 
> > yep.  toplevel.
> 
> done, default cc is libre-soc-org@libre-soc.org and you are the default
> assignee, congratulations.

Is it possible for me to be authorized to create 2nd level components to
supplement the "Planning" category? That is, access without needing to be
granted full access rights to the database and the whole administrative
apparatus of bugzilla?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

[libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 307] look at installing a kan-ban board on top of bugzilla

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=307

--- Comment #16 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> ---
(In reply to Alain D D Williams from comment #14)

> I will also point it at the latest version of buzilla that I installed a few
> days ago.

excellent.

> First thing is apache on port 8080, get that to work, then worry about
> proxying.

thats a good idea, just run open socket listen 8080:0.0.0.0 for now.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev