Libre RISC-V Mailing list Archives (accessible via public-inbox)
 help / color / Atom feed
From: bugzilla-daemon@libre-soc.org
To: libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
Subject: [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 313] Create Branch Pipeline for POWER9
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 21:07:40 +0000
Message-ID: <bug-313-13-FOOvRt5OUP@https.bugs.libre-soc.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-313-13@https.bugs.libre-soc.org/>

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=313

--- Comment #14 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> ---
waaaa...

    insn       CR  SPR1  SPR2    SPR3
    ----       --  ----  ----    ----
    op_b       xx  LR     xx     xx
    op_ba      xx  LR     xx     xx
    op_bl      xx  LR     xx     xx
    op_bla     xx  LR     xx     xx
    op_bc      CR, LR,    CTR    xx
    op_bca     CR, LR,    CTR    xx
    op_bcl     CR, LR,    CTR    xx
    op_bcla    CR, LR,    CTR    xx
    op_bclr    CR, LR,    CTR    xx
    op_bclrl   CR, LR,    CTR    xx
    op_bcctr   CR, LR,    CTR    xx
    op_bcctrl  CR, LR,    CTR    xx
    op_bctar   CR, LR,    CTR,   TAR
    op_bctarl  CR, LR,    CTR,   TAR

    op_sc      xx  xx     xx     MSR
    op_scv     xx  LR,    SRR1,  MSR
    op_rfscv   xx  LR,    CTR,   MSR
    op_rfid    xx  SRR0,  SRR1,  MSR
    op_hrfid   xx  HSRR0, HSRR1, MSR

and if we did TRAP in the Branch pipeline as well, that would be
*six* incoming 64-bit register latch paths.  nooo, i don't think so :)

so the above table should guide the numbering.  LR - that's not an SPR,
is it?  if not, then ho hum we should call the field lr_or_spr1 or something
horrible.  not a huge fan of long data structure names, but hey :)

* the BranchCompUnit should expect to read the SPR regfile and allocate
  lr_or_spr1, spr2, and spr3 accordingly.
* BranchInputData should be the target recipient of that data
* branch/main_stage should decode the three fields lr_or_spr1, spr2 and spr3
  likewise according to that table.

for op_bc* that's dead simple: lr = lr_or_spr1, ctr = spr2, tar = spr3

for op_sc and other system calls it's more complex, but doable.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

  parent reply index

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-15 15:30 [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 313] New: " bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 15:30 ` [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 313] " bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 15:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 17:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 17:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 18:58 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 19:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 19:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 19:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 19:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 19:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 19:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 20:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 20:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 20:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 20:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 21:07 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2020-05-15 21:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 21:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 22:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 23:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-16  0:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-17 17:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-17 18:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-17 19:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-19 12:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-19 18:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-19 18:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-19 21:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-19 21:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-19 21:09   ` Jacob Lifshay
2020-05-19 21:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-19 21:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-19 21:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-19 21:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 18:43   ` [libre-riscv-dev] monorepo Jacob Lifshay
2020-05-20 19:08     ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-05-20 19:17       ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-05-19 21:44 ` [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 313] Create Branch Pipeline for POWER9 bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-22  2:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-22  8:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-22 13:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-22 13:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-22 14:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-22 14:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-22 14:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-22 18:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-23  1:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-23  3:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-01 20:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-02 18:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-02 18:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-02 19:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-02 20:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-02 20:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-02 20:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-02 21:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-02 21:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-02 21:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-02 22:41 ` bugzilla-daemon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-313-13-FOOvRt5OUP@https.bugs.libre-soc.org/ \
    --to=bugzilla-daemon@libre-soc.org \
    --cc=libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Libre RISC-V Mailing list Archives (accessible via public-inbox)

Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://inbox.libre-soc.org/libre-riscv-dev

Example config snippet for mirrors


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git