* [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 268] New: nmigen does not seem to support write-through SRAM
@ 2020-03-27 9:50 bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-27 10:44 ` [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 268] " bugzilla-daemon
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2020-03-27 9:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libre-riscv-dev
http://bugs.libre-riscv.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268
Bug ID: 268
Summary: nmigen does not seem to support write-through SRAM
Product: Libre-SOC's first SoC
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: CONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: ---
Component: Source Code
Assignee: lkcl@lkcl.net
Reporter: lkcl@lkcl.net
CC: libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
NLnet milestone: ---
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/pipermail/libre-riscv-dev/2020-March/005453.html
we would like to have write-through capability in nmigen Memory. when
one write-port writes, a read-port *in the same major cycle* is capable
of receiving that same data.
Staf mentions that the SRAM that he is doing makes that data available
on the *falling* edge (not on the exact same cycle).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 268] nmigen does not seem to support write-through SRAM
2020-03-27 9:50 [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 268] New: nmigen does not seem to support write-through SRAM bugzilla-daemon
@ 2020-03-27 10:44 ` " bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-27 10:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2020-03-27 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libre-riscv-dev
http://bugs.libre-riscv.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268
Staf Verhaegen <staf@fibraservi.eu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |staf@fibraservi.eu
--- Comment #1 from Staf Verhaegen <staf@fibraservi.eu> ---
I may have overlooked something and write-through may actually be implemented.
I think the trick is to have both a read and a write port; have these port
share the same address signal and also do a read when you do a write (e.g. have
transparent read port which make the read port always enabled).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 268] nmigen does not seem to support write-through SRAM
2020-03-27 9:50 [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 268] New: nmigen does not seem to support write-through SRAM bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-27 10:44 ` [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 268] " bugzilla-daemon
@ 2020-03-27 10:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-27 13:45 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-27 16:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2020-03-27 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libre-riscv-dev
http://bugs.libre-riscv.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |programmerjake@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> ---
i think this was the basis of a unit test that jacob wrote, and he found that
there was a definite bug in the nmigen Simulation. i believe however it
was a 2R1W arrangement. jacob can you remember?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 268] nmigen does not seem to support write-through SRAM
2020-03-27 9:50 [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 268] New: nmigen does not seem to support write-through SRAM bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-27 10:44 ` [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 268] " bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-27 10:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2020-03-27 13:45 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-27 16:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2020-03-27 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libre-riscv-dev
http://bugs.libre-riscv.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268
--- Comment #3 from Jacob Lifshay <programmerjake@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #2)
> i think this was the basis of a unit test that jacob wrote, and he found that
> there was a definite bug in the nmigen Simulation. i believe however it
> was a 2R1W arrangement. jacob can you remember?
Found it:
https://salsa.debian.org/Kazan-team/simple-barrel-processor/-/blob/391d95f30bd99e37236af8fb95565809b7230e29/test/test_mem.py
nmigen bug:
https://github.com/m-labs/nmigen/issues/47
Turned out that write conflicts weren't implemented as advertised, the buggy
feature (write port priority) was later removed:
https://github.com/m-labs/nmigen/commit/a02e3750bfeba44bcaad4c5de8d9eb0ef055d9c6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 268] nmigen does not seem to support write-through SRAM
2020-03-27 9:50 [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 268] New: nmigen does not seem to support write-through SRAM bugzilla-daemon
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-03-27 13:45 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2020-03-27 16:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2020-03-27 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: libre-riscv-dev
http://bugs.libre-riscv.org/show_bug.cgi?id=268
--- Comment #4 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> ---
okaaay so that's write-port *priority*, not the same thing as write-*through*
capability. you've got a (similar?) unit test kicking around, would you be ok
writing a similar one that checks if what is written can be read on the same
clock cycle?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, back to index
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-03-27 9:50 [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 268] New: nmigen does not seem to support write-through SRAM bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-27 10:44 ` [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 268] " bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-27 10:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-27 13:45 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-27 16:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
Libre RISC-V Mailing list Archives (accessible via public-inbox)
Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://inbox.libre-soc.org/libre-riscv-dev
Example config snippet for mirrors
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git