From: bugzilla-daemon@libre-soc.org
To: libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
Subject: [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 316] bperm TODO
Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 00:56:24 +0000
Message-ID: <bug-316-13-YqFzLoiJCG@https.bugs.libre-soc.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-316-13@https.bugs.libre-soc.org/>
https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=316
--- Comment #60 from Cole Poirier <colepoirier@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #58)
> (In reply to Jacob Lifshay from comment #55)
> > (In reply to Cole Poirier from comment #54)
> > > Ah yes, appreciated, I will grep first in the future. For clarification, the
> > > way to run the tests is by cd'ing to the soc/decoder directory then running
> > > 'python3 test/{test_file.py}' for each of the files in the tests directory?
>
> because i run ctags in one directory (usually the top level or close to it)
> and stay there.
>
> i generally run e.g. python3 fu/alu/test/test_pipe_caller.py or something.
> constantly doing "cd" i find very annoying.
>
> to find previously-run commands is a matter of running "history" followed by
> !inserthistorynumber
>
> this saves typing the command out repeatedly - also very annoying.
>
> lots of annoyingness... :)
Ah that sounds radically better than my 'dumb' bog-standard online/corporate
unix training method of cd .. cd cd cd cd ..... ahhhh!!! I'll have to do a
quick read of what ctags is and how to use it as you've specified tomorrow. And
go back and reference your email to me from march that outlined how I could set
up my computer as you have yours set up.
> > > Or do I cd to the top level soc directory, and run 'sudo python3 setup.py
> > > test'?
> >
> > Definitely don't use `sudo`.
>
> yep. it will result in test output that, on return as the ordinary user,
> you will not be able to overwrite. to "fix" that, do this:
>
> soc/src$ sudo bash
> soc/src# chown -R colepoirier .
> soc/src# exit
> soc/src$
>
> that will ensure that all files are owned by you (not root) in the entire soc
> locally checked out repository.
>
> a "dumb" way to achieve the same effect is to completely destroy the entire
> checkout. this is wasteful of both time and bandwidth.
Perfect. Worked.
> > I cd to the top level and run either `python3 setup.py test` or `nosetests`.
>
> this runs every single test, which consumes a lot of time however is a good
> idea.
>
> to get a "faster development cycle" i tend to run only the test that is
> needed.
> delays in that cycle - by running tests that have nothing to do with the
> task at
> hand - i also find annoying.
>
> however *after* that fast-iterative cycle (explicitly running only the
> relevant
> test), it is kinda important to run more (nosetests3, python3 setup.py test)
> just
> to make absolutely sure you didn't break anything unrelated. don't tell
> no-one
> i tend not to do that very often... :)
Hmm will try to do as you preach not as you practice then :)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev
next prev parent reply index
Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-15 21:01 [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 316] New: " bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 21:06 ` [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 316] " bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 21:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 21:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 22:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 22:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-15 22:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-16 0:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-16 0:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-16 1:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-16 1:45 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-16 2:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-16 3:59 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-16 4:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-16 4:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-16 4:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-16 4:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-16 21:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-16 21:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-16 21:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-16 21:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-16 22:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-16 22:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-16 22:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-16 22:47 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-16 23:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-17 11:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-17 17:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-17 18:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-17 18:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-17 21:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-17 21:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-17 22:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-17 23:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-17 23:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-18 0:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-18 0:45 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-18 0:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-18 1:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-18 4:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-18 19:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-18 22:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-18 22:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-18 23:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-18 23:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-18 23:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-18 23:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-19 0:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-19 0:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-19 14:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-19 19:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-19 19:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-19 19:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 0:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 0:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 0:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 0:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 0:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 0:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 0:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 0:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 0:56 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2020-05-20 1:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 1:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 1:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 1:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 1:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 1:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 1:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 1:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 17:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 17:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 18:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 18:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 18:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 19:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 19:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 22:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-20 22:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-21 0:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-21 18:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-21 18:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-21 18:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-21 18:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-21 18:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-21 19:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-21 19:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-21 21:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-21 21:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-21 22:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-21 22:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-21 22:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-22 0:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-22 1:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-22 18:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-23 22:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-24 16:45 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-24 17:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-24 18:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-24 18:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-25 21:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-25 21:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-316-13-YqFzLoiJCG@https.bugs.libre-soc.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@libre-soc.org \
--cc=libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Libre RISC-V Mailing list Archives (accessible via public-inbox)
Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://inbox.libre-soc.org/libre-riscv-dev
Example config snippet for mirrors
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git