Libre RISC-V Mailing list Archives (accessible via public-inbox)
 help / color / Atom feed
From: bugzilla-daemon@libre-soc.org
To: libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
Subject: [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 216] LOAD STORE buffer needed
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:53:04 +0000
Message-ID: <bug-216-13-RtUNtxvRRn@https.bugs.libre-soc.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-216-13@https.bugs.libre-soc.org/>

https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216

--- Comment #24 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> ---
i just realised something:

* misaligned LD/STs will create a pair of LD/STs (on each FU) where it
  is *guaranteed* that Addr[4] for the LO-HI request will be mutually
  exclusive.  if Addr[4] is 0 for the LO request of the pair, Addr[4]
  is *guaranteed* to be 1 for the HI request of the pair

* therefore splitting into L0 left/right LO/HI isn't going to work...
  unless we accept that the LO/HI requests actually *cross over*!

FU0 LO -> L0 left  if Addr[4] == 0  else L0 right
FU0 HI -> L0 right addr 4 will be 1 else L0 right

this has the strong disadvantage of not keeping the addresses that
we *know* have the same bits in the upper parts [12:48].

the other way to do it therefore is for the L0 to be only 8 rows
deep, comprising *two* 128-bit entries, i.e. to be integrated
L0-odd and L0-even where previously it was two separate L0 caches.

two L1 caches would then connect to that.

i'll think it through.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

  parent reply index

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-216-13@https.bugs.libre-soc.org/>
2020-04-19  9:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-04-19  9:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-04-19 15:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-04-19 17:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-04-20  9:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-04-22 10:53 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2020-04-22 12:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-04-25 12:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-04-26 11:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-04-27 11:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-04-29 11:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-04-29 21:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-01 13:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-01 13:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-04 10:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-04 20:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-06  0:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-06  1:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-06  1:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-06  8:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-06  8:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-06 12:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-06 13:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-18  4:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-23 15:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-23 15:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-24 19:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-24 19:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-25 10:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-25 13:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-26 12:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-27 11:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-28 12:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-28 12:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-28 13:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-28 13:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-28 20:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-29 13:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-29 16:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-30 19:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-02 18:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-04 16:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-05 19:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-05 19:40 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-07 23:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-11 20:28 [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 216] New: " bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-11 22:54 ` [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 216] " bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-11 23:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-12  1:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-12 11:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-12 13:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-12 17:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-13 11:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-13 18:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-13 20:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-15 21:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-16 17:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-23 10:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-24 13:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-24 14:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-24 18:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-24 20:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-03-24 20:27 ` bugzilla-daemon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-216-13-RtUNtxvRRn@https.bugs.libre-soc.org/ \
    --to=bugzilla-daemon@libre-soc.org \
    --cc=libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Libre RISC-V Mailing list Archives (accessible via public-inbox)

Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://inbox.libre-soc.org/libre-riscv-dev

Example config snippet for mirrors


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git