From: bugzilla-daemon@libre-soc.org
To: libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
Subject: [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 336] ALU CompUnit needs to recognise that RA (src1) can be zero
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 15:32:01 +0000
Message-ID: <bug-336-13-PceItO5wCv@https.bugs.libre-soc.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-336-13@https.bugs.libre-soc.org/>
https://bugs.libre-soc.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336
--- Comment #33 from Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl@lkcl.net> ---
(In reply to Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton from comment #32)
> (In reply to Cesar Strauss from comment #31)
> > Regarding the parallel test:
> >
> > Pushed a proof of concept.
> >
> > Defective as it was, I pushed it anyway, hoping for some feedback on the
> > bug. Found it myself literally seconds after pushing.
>
> :)
>
> ok i added some stubs here.
right. so i've pushed another commit which shows where we would expect to
put the inputs in (constructor). rather than have them directly as arguments
to op_sim(), all those arguments - a, b, op, inv_a, imm_ok, zero_a - they
become the arguments to the constructor.
also expected_o should be in the constructor as well.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev
next prev parent reply index
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-21 16:24 [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 336] New: add indicator to Decode2ExecuteType that RA is zero bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-21 16:35 ` [libre-riscv-dev] [Bug 336] ALU CompUnit needs to recognise that RA (src1) can be zero bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-21 16:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-21 21:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-21 21:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-22 1:11 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-23 12:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-23 13:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-23 19:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-23 19:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-23 19:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-23 20:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-23 22:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-23 23:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-24 1:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-24 3:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-24 13:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-24 14:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-24 14:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-24 14:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-24 15:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-24 20:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-24 20:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-24 20:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-25 0:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-25 0:56 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-25 1:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-25 1:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-25 1:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-25 2:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-25 2:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-25 4:05 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-25 7:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-25 9:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-25 10:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-25 15:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-25 15:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-25 15:32 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2020-05-25 23:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-25 23:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-26 10:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-26 10:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-26 16:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-26 17:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-28 10:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-05-31 16:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-01 11:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-01 11:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-01 11:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-01 12:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-01 12:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-01 21:50 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-01 22:04 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-02 23:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-06 20:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-06 20:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-06 21:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-06 22:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-07 20:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-07 22:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-08 1:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-08 1:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-09 12:36 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-09 12:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-14 23:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2020-06-14 23:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-336-13-PceItO5wCv@https.bugs.libre-soc.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@libre-soc.org \
--cc=libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Libre RISC-V Mailing list Archives (accessible via public-inbox)
Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://inbox.libre-soc.org/libre-riscv-dev
Example config snippet for mirrors
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git