Libre RISC-V Mailing list Archives (accessible via public-inbox)
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Staf Verhaegen <staf@fibraservi.eu>
To: libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
Subject: Re: [libre-riscv-dev] cache SRAM organisation
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 10:08:48 +0100
Message-ID: <65e762e270e3660044604cc48f4fbd554d34af13.camel@fibraservi.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPweEDx9YH=0DWviRYJySR9++n-Nd88ZHkRb8EkWhah3x4MbeQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1651 bytes --]

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton schreef op do 26-03-2020 om 21:28 [+0000]:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 8:08 PM Staf Verhaegen <staf@fibraservi.eu> wrote:
> > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton schreef op do 26-03-2020 om 15:15 [+0000]:
> > > On Thursday, March 26, 2020, Staf Verhaegen <staf@fibraservi.eu> wrote:
> > > > I can understand you do this to implement functional units withconfigurable pipeline length but I would strongly discourage to pipelineregister files after each other .
> > > 
> > > 
> > > "pipeline register files after each other"? apologies i am not clear whatyou mean, here.  do you mean "don't do write-thru on the Regfile"?
> > 
> > No I meant for example connecting the output of one port of an asynchronous RAM to for example the address input of another port of an asynchronous RAM.
> 
> ah right, no definitely not.  the connections are:
> RegisterFile readport[0..R] ==> FunctionUnit[0..M] operand latches                                            pipeline stage 0                                            pipeline stage 1                                            ...                                            pipeline stage NRegisterFile writeport[0..W] <== FunctionUnit[0..M] result latches
> (and also: )register file bypass forwardingbus <== FunctionUnit result latchesregister file bypass forwardingbus ==> FunctionUnit operand latches
> so the asynchronous SRAMs will definitely *only* be connected to SFFlatches.  *not* to other asynchronous SRAMs.

I still feel you intermix synchronous and write-through in this statement, the above seems to be possible with synchronous SRAMs.

greets,
Staf.


[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 177 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev

  reply index

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-24 22:32 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-25 10:54 ` Staf Verhaegen
2020-03-25 12:33   ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-25 13:46     ` Staf Verhaegen
2020-03-25 15:53       ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-25 17:49         ` Jacob Lifshay
2020-03-26 12:18         ` Staf Verhaegen
2020-03-26 12:31           ` Staf Verhaegen
2020-03-26 15:15             ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-26 15:15           ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-26 20:08             ` Staf Verhaegen
2020-03-26 21:28               ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-27  9:08                 ` Staf Verhaegen [this message]
2020-03-27  9:16                   ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-27  9:40                     ` Staf Verhaegen
2020-03-27  9:46                       ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-27  9:52                         ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-26 12:27         ` Staf Verhaegen
2020-03-26 13:05           ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-26 20:18             ` Staf Verhaegen
2020-03-26 21:37               ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-27  9:25                 ` Staf Verhaegen
2020-03-27  9:44                   ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-27 10:03                     ` Lauri Kasanen
2020-03-27 10:10                       ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-27 10:36                     ` Staf Verhaegen
2020-03-27 10:59                       ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-28 14:08                         ` [libre-riscv-dev] Clock Gating (was cache SRAM organisation) Staf Verhaegen
2020-03-28 14:26                           ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=65e762e270e3660044604cc48f4fbd554d34af13.camel@fibraservi.eu \
    --to=staf@fibraservi.eu \
    --cc=libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Libre RISC-V Mailing list Archives (accessible via public-inbox)

Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://inbox.libre-soc.org/libre-riscv-dev

Example config snippet for mirrors


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git