From: Staf Verhaegen <staf@fibraservi.eu>
To: libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
Subject: Re: [libre-riscv-dev] cache SRAM organisation
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 21:18:34 +0100
Message-ID: <b18283c7e7a93fa8afdef2f0a8679b26e4569528.camel@fibraservi.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPweEDzEvtPYGKvGMvebmQzhJDhSgfvUOVZvB2WXxSbv_ebE8A@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 793 bytes --]
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton schreef op do 26-03-2020 om 13:05 [+0000]:
> On Thursday, March 26, 2020, Staf Verhaegen <staf@fibraservi.eu> wrote:
> > Would like to make separate side remark here. In ASICs MUXes are relativeexpensive gates with respect to delay and power. So if this principle isgenerally applied over the whole design it will make it difficult to make achip that is competitive in power/performance compared to ARM/x86 CPUs.
>
>
> just the ALU pipeline registers. we felt that the advantage of being ableto drop to say 500mhz and halve the number of pipeline stages to say 5, andalso be able to ramp up to 1.6ghz and double bavk up to 10 stages, wasworth considering.
What would be the advantage over running at 800Mhz with 5 pipeline stages ?
greets,
Staf.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 177 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
libre-riscv-dev mailing list
libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org
http://lists.libre-riscv.org/mailman/listinfo/libre-riscv-dev
next prev parent reply index
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-24 22:32 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-25 10:54 ` Staf Verhaegen
2020-03-25 12:33 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-25 13:46 ` Staf Verhaegen
2020-03-25 15:53 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-25 17:49 ` Jacob Lifshay
2020-03-26 12:18 ` Staf Verhaegen
2020-03-26 12:31 ` Staf Verhaegen
2020-03-26 15:15 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-26 15:15 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-26 20:08 ` Staf Verhaegen
2020-03-26 21:28 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-27 9:08 ` Staf Verhaegen
2020-03-27 9:16 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-27 9:40 ` Staf Verhaegen
2020-03-27 9:46 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-27 9:52 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-26 12:27 ` Staf Verhaegen
2020-03-26 13:05 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-26 20:18 ` Staf Verhaegen [this message]
2020-03-26 21:37 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-27 9:25 ` Staf Verhaegen
2020-03-27 9:44 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-27 10:03 ` Lauri Kasanen
2020-03-27 10:10 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-27 10:36 ` Staf Verhaegen
2020-03-27 10:59 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2020-03-28 14:08 ` [libre-riscv-dev] Clock Gating (was cache SRAM organisation) Staf Verhaegen
2020-03-28 14:26 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b18283c7e7a93fa8afdef2f0a8679b26e4569528.camel@fibraservi.eu \
--to=staf@fibraservi.eu \
--cc=libre-riscv-dev@lists.libre-riscv.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Libre RISC-V Mailing list Archives (accessible via public-inbox)
Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://inbox.libre-soc.org/libre-riscv-dev
Example config snippet for mirrors
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git